Post by RandomJester~RLV on Dec 22, 2005 10:01:10 GMT -5
Well to inject alittle bit of active-ness in this forum, I just wanted to create a (very IMHO) debated topic(s) I've been studying.
What really killed JFK?
Facts:
The medically trained doctor said he died from bullet wounds to the head.
Evidence, based upon 3D simulations conducted by both history channel, and a university I can't remember, say that only two bullets were fired, and then by going to the spot were the shooter(s) were supposed to have been, they used bullet-trails to track all possible angles that he could have been shot from, only three of four could be determined, and only 2 were in the proper places to match the governments claim that it was a shot to the neck and chest.
But, the governments claim that it was a neck and chest wound that killed him don't match up with the report from the doctors, "he died insert time here, from a shot from a rifle, to the back region of the head."
Anyone with a theory(s) on what really happened?
Devil Triangle
Many ships have been sighted in the waters of the devils triangle, and very few, if not none come out.
There are very few facts to support government cover-up, magnetic disturbance, or alien foot-hold.Anyone with a theory on what is really going on?
Loch' Ness Monster
well there you have it, anyone have any theorys or opinions you want to share about these topics?
What really killed JFK?
Facts:
The medically trained doctor said he died from bullet wounds to the head.
Evidence, based upon 3D simulations conducted by both history channel, and a university I can't remember, say that only two bullets were fired, and then by going to the spot were the shooter(s) were supposed to have been, they used bullet-trails to track all possible angles that he could have been shot from, only three of four could be determined, and only 2 were in the proper places to match the governments claim that it was a shot to the neck and chest.
But, the governments claim that it was a neck and chest wound that killed him don't match up with the report from the doctors, "he died insert time here, from a shot from a rifle, to the back region of the head."
Devil Triangle
Many ships have been sighted in the waters of the devils triangle, and very few, if not none come out.
There are very few facts to support government cover-up, magnetic disturbance, or alien foot-hold.
Loch' Ness Monster
Now this is going to be fun for me, because I like to poke abit of fun at the frauds of this myth.
Frauds
1.) The Famous surgeon's photo as it is called, was proven to be a fraud because, on the man's death bed, the confessed that he made a model, and put it in the lake and hastily photographed it.
2.) the "gargoyle head" photograph, this photo containted a image of what some people believe to be the head and fin/flipper of the claimed Loch' ness monster. BUT a local news editor forgot to add to his paper, that he had enhanced the images with a spray brush and gone over what he had thought was the fin/flipper area and the claimed nose, mouth and eyes that make up the "gargoyle's head" photo. In fact a few years later the man that took that underwater photograph went back and looked closer at it, it turns out that is was just a log.
grain-of-truth
1.) many people including many political officials have seen this monster, and in fact there was a boat captain sailing the lake, with a friend recording the boat from the shore, but there infront of the boat was infact a eel-like body rising and bob-ing on the surface as if to swim, it swam not unlike a snake, and with the boat in comparison it turns out that this thing must have been about 30-40 feet in length.
2. every year afew people catch a glimpse at this "creature" wither it's fact or fiction, they believe they see something.
Frauds
1.) The Famous surgeon's photo as it is called, was proven to be a fraud because, on the man's death bed, the confessed that he made a model, and put it in the lake and hastily photographed it.
2.) the "gargoyle head" photograph, this photo containted a image of what some people believe to be the head and fin/flipper of the claimed Loch' ness monster. BUT a local news editor forgot to add to his paper, that he had enhanced the images with a spray brush and gone over what he had thought was the fin/flipper area and the claimed nose, mouth and eyes that make up the "gargoyle's head" photo. In fact a few years later the man that took that underwater photograph went back and looked closer at it, it turns out that is was just a log.
grain-of-truth
1.) many people including many political officials have seen this monster, and in fact there was a boat captain sailing the lake, with a friend recording the boat from the shore, but there infront of the boat was infact a eel-like body rising and bob-ing on the surface as if to swim, it swam not unlike a snake, and with the boat in comparison it turns out that this thing must have been about 30-40 feet in length.
2. every year afew people catch a glimpse at this "creature" wither it's fact or fiction, they believe they see something.
well there you have it, anyone have any theorys or opinions you want to share about these topics?